Collisions of rigid-link robots and rigid environments are often modeled as instantaneous events. Under this idealization, the impact forces become impulsive and the system velocities nonsmooth. In this work, we systematically analyze pre- and post-impact velocities focusing on what we refer to as the nonsmooth impact direction (NSID). We show that it is a characteristic direction of a robotic impact and largely independent of contact properties. The results are directly applicable to large classes of backdrivable robotic systems with rigid links. We address particularities of systems with nonelastic and flexible joints, unconstrained as well as constrained systems. Further, we show that the approach direction w.r.t the NSID sets the direction of the impulsive force in frictional, inelastic impacts. The comprehensive theoretical analysis of this work supported by an experimental validation may serve as a foundation for future planning and control algorithms for various robotic impact applications. These can include humanoid locomotion on a slippery surface or repetitive hammering.

Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) algorithms are powerful tools for learning from and generalizing expert demonstrations, but they often rely on unconstrained exploration, rendering them unsafe for real-world deployment. Meanwhile, Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) can guarantee the safety of control systems, but the analytical design of CBFs can be time-consuming and esoteric. In this work, we address these limitations jointly by constraining reward function candidacy during IRL to the space of CBFs, yielding a formulation that exhibits safe online control with continuous experiential improvement. Crucially, this framework enables the data-driven recovery of barrier functions directly from unlabeled expert observations. We demonstrate that the recovered barrier function is robust to unsafe states entirely absent from the expert data. Furthermore, we benchmark our method against standard IRL baselines in a simulated navigation environment, demonstrating improved safety performance. Finally, we investigate the trade-offs of planning-based versus policy-based IRL methods across both simulation and a real world obstacle avoidance task.

Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) necessitates an embodied agent to navigate in the physical world by adhering to natural language instructions. Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLM) have propelled the development of VLM-based VLN methods with two predominant paradigms: (1) imitation learning (IL) on expert demonstrations, followed by the Dataset Aggregation (DAgger) algorithm to bolster error recovery capabilities; (2) reinforcement learning (RL) driven by verifiable rewards to enhance reasoning and exploration. A notable gap is the absence of integration between these two distinct paradigms. This paper introduces JOP-VLN, a novel VLN framework that synergistically combines off-policy imitation learning and on-policy exploration within a three-stage training pipeline. Initially, IL is employed on expert demonstrations to acquire basic navigation skills. Subsequently, the DAgger algorithm is utilized to generate heuristic exploration trajectories, which are then used for imitation learning to improve error recovery capabilities. Finally, a joint on-and-off policy learning framework is implemented, featuring high-entropy trajectory sampling to enhance RL training efficiency and an error-correction-prioritized trajectory sorting strategy for effective error correction. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficacy of JOP-VLN, achieving success rates of 69.9% and 68.0% on the VLN-CE R2R and RxR benchmarks, respectively, setting a new state-of-the-art on R2R. Project page: https://qingrongh.github.io/JOP-VLN.

Selective harvesting in clustered strawberry environments is challenging because ripe fruits are often occluded by surrounding unripe fruits, making direct grasping unreliable. To address this problem, this paper proposes a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework, termed VGPA, which integrates a vision-guided decision mechanism and a Progressive Adaptive Exploration Strategy (PAES) for vision-based obstacle separation and harvesting. The task was decomposed into two sequential stages: obstacle separation and target grasping. At the high level, the vision-guided mechanism improved option selection and accelerated policy convergence. At the low level, PAES improved exploration efficiency and training stability during continuous control learning. In simulation experiments, the learned policy achieved a success rate of 96.7%. In addition, sim-to-real transfer experiments on a self-developed parallel robot showed that the proposed method achieved success rates ranging from 71.7% to 88.3%, outperforming direct picking while requiring only 1.22~s more average harvesting time. These results verified the effectiveness, generalization ability, and practical potential of the proposed method for robotic harvesting in complex clustered environments.

The uncanny valley is a long-standing empirical rule in humanoid robot design: making robots more human-like can reduce, rather than increase, affinity. Yet existing guidelines, such as adopting robot-like appearances, avoiding excessive realism, and reducing cross-modal mismatches, remain difficult to use for algorithmic design because they are not expressed as manipulable variables. Here, we propose a hierarchical Bayesian generative model that operationalizes these guidelines as mathematical design variables. The model represents affinity toward humanoid robots as posterior-weighted negative category-conditional surprise and explains category ambiguity and perceptual mismatch as increases in surprise. It maps uncanny-valley mechanisms onto four variables: deviation from the predicted robot-category mean, inconsistency in human likeness across modalities, prediction uncertainty, and observational uncertainty. Simulations showed that category ambiguity and appearance--motion mismatch can produce affinity reductions, and that uncertainty reshapes the valley. In a human-subject experiment with robot--human morphing images, we manipulated prediction uncertainty using blurred prior robot stimuli and observational uncertainty using blurred evaluation stimuli. Increased observational uncertainty attenuated the decrease in familiarity ratings at intermediate human likeness, whereas low prediction uncertainty increased ratings for robot-like appearances. This framework turns empirical uncanny-valley heuristics into a computational basis for algorithmically evaluating and optimizing humanoid robot appearance and behavior.

Simulating deformable objects is essential for a wide range of robotic manipulation applications, yet accurately predicting their dynamics remains challenging. We propose Physics-Guided Residual Dynamics (PGRD), a hybrid simulation framework that combines the advantages of physics-based and learning-based approaches. Specifically, PGRD combines an optimizable spring-mass simulator as a backbone with a learned neural network that predicts residual corrections to the physics-based predictions. We adopt a velocity-based formulation to ensure stable simulation and a sliding-window transformer architecture to capture temporal dependencies. We show that PGRD produces more accurate results than both purely physics-based and learning-based methods on a set of diverse real-world deformable objects. We further demonstrate the utility of PGRD in two applications: manipulation planning via Model Predictive Control, including a language-conditioned setting with a generated goal image; and interactive simulation via action-conditioned video prediction by 3D Gaussian Splatting.

Robotic manipulation poses fundamental challenges due to uncertainty, long-horizon execution, and compounding errors, which can easily destabilize execution and lead to task failure. Although recent vision-language-action (VLA) models exhibit strong generalization, they typically lack explicit mechanisms to assess execution stability and to recover when execution deviates from its nominal behavior. In this paper, we propose: (1) two complementary metrics to assess execution quality at runtime, and (2) an agentic reinforcement learning framework that learns to restore effective execution through high-level decision-making rather than directly learning low-level actions. In this framework, an agentic policy reasons over recent execution history and selects among a small set of execution modes to regulate the execution process. Under execution degradation, it triggers appropriate recovery mechanisms to restore the robot to previously visited nominal states, enabling the task to continue. We evaluate the proposed method on the LIBERO benchmark, achieving up to a 13.7% improvement in success rate under standard settings and up to a 39.2% improvement under disturbance settings, demonstrating substantially enhanced execution robustness.