Across a Physical AI stack, evaluation maturity is inversely aligned with deployment risk: foundation models enjoy mature, standardized harnesses, while the embodied layers on which deployment actually turns remain fragmented across benchmark-specific simulators, embodiments, and interfaces. The first DeepInsight report (v1) unified evaluation across this stack behind three abstractions---task, resource, and result---but its quantitative evidence centered on the foundation-model layer; navigation and manipulation (System 1) and whole-body control (System 0) remained simulation case studies, and physical execution was outside its empirical scope. DeepInsight II keeps that substrate fixed and quantifies the embodied half. First, it reproduces released-checkpoint references across two navigation and four manipulation benchmarks under their native protocols. Second, MotionBench places four released whole-body controllers under one workload and metric contract, then carries a qualified within-family cohort from parallel simulation to matched real-robot trials in which simulated and physical rollouts share a parent trace identity while retaining execution-domain-specific records, making the sim-to-real gap a native reduction rather than a reconciliation across toolchains. Third, a composed System 2--1--0 study extends trace localization into five evidence-grounded handoff labels, each mapped to a concrete repair action, with a measured repairability criterion and physical episodes testing the same attribution under hardware-observable state. The contribution is therefore not a new evaluation architecture, but empirical continuity from benchmark execution to matched robot evidence and repair-oriented diagnosis.

In this study, we investigate developmental mechanisms that enable small, resource-constrained systems such as cm-sized millirobots to autonomously explore, learn, and adapt their capabilities throughout their lifespan. Reinforcement learning algorithms guide the agent's skill acquisition and adaptation through the interplay of our proposed tinyDSM, which integrates intrinsic motivation and fitness-based assessment. We strive for minimal, hard-wired skills while encouraging the open-ended development of new skills. A key emphasis in our approach is to encode minimal a-priori general knowledge, which serves as a foundational starting point for the system as it further learns system-specific dependencies from the initial knowledge provided. Thus, by design, our approach attempts to cover very generic application domains. The methodology is based on (a) developmental mechanism with intrinsic motivation, and (b) a cognitive architecture (knowledge, reasoning, learning), while (c) utilizing minimal resources. It uses a hierarchical knowledge graph and kinematic reasoners to model and evaluate simple and advanced motion related skills. In our experiments, we use a resource-constrained millirobot with a volume of 36 cm^3 with a Raspberry Pi Pico 32-bit microcontroller (RP2040) that integrates all described features and capabilities except the camera system in 9 kB. Starting with learning the most elementary motor skills the millirobot autonomously progresses from simple linear and angular movements to complex geometric patterns within 15 minutes. To complement the physical experiments, we perform a simulation-based analysis that enables systematic comparisons across learning algorithms and intrinsic motivation parameters.

End-to-end imitation learning avoids hand-made robot motion for approaching and grasping, but the policy must still decide which fruit to pick and where to close the gripper. Occlusion can make the policy lose the selected fruit during harvesting, and the correct closing point is difficult to infer from pixels alone. This paper presents HarvestPoint-ACT, which makes both decisions explicit in perception and provides them to the policy. An instance segmentation front end with a keypoint branch predicts a mask and a harvest point for each visible fruit, where the harvest point specifies the location to close the gripper. A scheduler ranks detected candidates by occlusion and travel distance and selects one target. After each attempt, it redetects and reranks the candidates because the canopy may have changed. The selected fruit is encoded for an action chunking transformer as an eight-dimensional state, containing the absolute harvest point, the vector from the gripper to that point, a validity flag, and a confidence score. When the selected fruit is temporarily undetected, the system retains the last harvest point estimate in the robot base frame and marks it as stale, and aborts the attempt if the loss persists. On a canopy mock-up, HarvestPoint-ACT achieves a success rate of 88%, and of 75% under heavy occlusion.

How to efficiently finetune robot policies to learn new tasks on the fly? State of the art robotic manipulation policies are based on behaviour cloning of large vision-language-action (VLA) models with billions of parameters on huge teleoperation datasets. While this simple approach has enabled significant advances for robotic manipulation, finetuning of VLA policies for learning new tasks still remains an open problem. In particular, collecting teleoperation datasets requires hundreds of hours of expensive human labour and the alternative, reinforcement learning (RL), can be notoriously sample-inefficient especially for long-horizon tasks. In addition, RL with VLAs imposes several challenges due to the model's size and architectural design. In this work, we propose EXIMO, an efficient algorithm for finetuning of VLA policies. EXIMO operates in three stages: explore, imitate, and optimize. During the explore phase, EXIMO equips the VLA with a vision language model (VLM) that acts as a planner. The VLM thinks and breaks down challenging long-horizon problems into shorter ones for the VLA. The VLM, together with the VLA, is used to collect an orchestrated dataset on new tasks. During the imitate phase, the VLA is finetuned with the orchestrated data. Finally, during the optimize stage, we use residual off-policy RL to further finetune the policy. In our experiments, we ablate all three stages of EXIMO and show that it outperforms existing approaches significantly in terms of sample-efficiency and final performance.

This paper presents a guide path-free multimodal trajectory planning framework for autonomous surface vehicles operating in dynamic environments. The proposed method integrates model predictive control (MPC) with a turning circle-based control barrier function (TC-CBF). Unlike conventional Euclidean distance-based CBFs (ED-CBFs), which evaluate safety solely based on proximity, the TC-CBF accounts for the nonholonomic motion and finite turning capability of a surface vehicle. Its geometric formulation identifies feasible avoidance regions according to the vehicle's turning circles and generates distinct left- and right-turning avoidance modes. These modes allow the optimization solver to explore and select topologically different trajectories without relying on globally planned guide paths, as required by many conventional multimodal planning approaches. By embedding the avoidance direction directly into the safety constraint, the proposed framework alleviates the local-minimum and deadlock problems of single-mode MPC while maintaining computational efficiency. Extensive simulations involving multiple moving vessels demonstrate that the proposed method achieves higher success rates, fewer safety violations, and smaller residual violations than single-mode baselines across all tested traffic densities.