Action chunking shortens the effective decision horizon of robot imitation learning by predicting multiple future actions, while conventional phase conditioning describes the current control instant. When a predicted horizon crosses a procedural boundary, assigning the current phase to the entire chunk creates a structural temporal mismatch. We present TRACT, which factorizes phase-structured action chunking into an accepted current phase and a single CURRENT-to-NEXT boundary inside the future horizon. A task-local graph constrains chronological phase authority, and a cumulative boundary distribution monotonically routes future queries through phase-specific query and action paths. For contact execution, a causal response-deficit integrator compares policy intent with ACK-eligible subsequent motion, accumulates arm compensation when directional response is suppressed, and decays after confirmed recovery. Across six real-robot variants with ten trials each, full TRACT achieves 10/10 full-sequence success, 99.00 [88.75, 100.00]% median [min, max] wipe completion, zero observed phase ambiguity, and zero stalls. Under the current complete method package and evaluation setting, the routed representation obtains better observed task results than the flat package (6/10 vs. 3/10 success; 77.08% vs. 8.03% median wipe completion). Chronological authority reduces observed phase ambiguity from 8/10 to 0/10, and response integration reduces stalls from 4/10 to 0/10. The package comparison does not isolate routing from other generator-package differences.

Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models has shown strong promise for robotic manipulation. Among RL methods, critic-based approaches rely on a value estimator that predominantly operates on single-frame observations or single-frame VLM backbone latents, which is a fundamental mismatch with the partially observable nature of robot control. A naive approach to incorporate observation history into the critic incurs exponential complexity with high-dimensional visual space, and still fails because pure scalar-return regression provides insufficient supervision for learning cross-temporal dynamics. We identify the root cause as a state approximation problem: without an explicit world modeling objective, the critic's representation cannot capture the temporal structure needed for accurate value estimation. To address this, we propose the World Critic Model (WCM), built on a lightweight LeJEPA architecture; WCM jointly predicts future latent state and estimates values, such that the critic's representation is explicitly trained to capture temporal dynamics rather than merely regress scalar returns. WCM integrates seamlessly into both on-policy and off-policy training pipelines and is compatible with state-of-the-art VLA backbones including Pi0, Pi0.5, and OpenVLA-OFT. Extensive experiments on 149 tasks across four benchmarks demonstrate that WCM consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings, with particularly strong generalization gains. We further validate WCM on seven real-world manipulation tasks using OpenVLA-OFT and Pi0.5 with off-policy RL, confirming stable deployment across diverse settings.

We investigate imitation learning through the lens of third-person observation and propose a framework for mirror learning: acquiring actionable policies from passive observation. While behavior cloning (BC) excels under dense, well-aligned first-person data, it fundamentally fails to leverage the rich observational signals arising from third-person demonstrations that humans and animals routinely exploit. We introduce a method that composes (i) a learned perspective transformation that places learners in demonstrators' shoes using a fine-tuned video diffusion model and (ii) an inverse dynamics model that infers action trajectories in the learners' control space. This enables the synthesis of mirror data, pseudo first-person expert data generated from third-person observations of demonstrator behavior. Empirically, we show that mirror data alone can train effective policies, and that augmenting first-person BC training with mirror data further improves downstream policy performance. Our results suggest that modern generative world models implicitly encode sufficient structure to enable a scalable and safe alternative to teleoperation-heavy data collection.

Visual imitation learning enables robots to acquire visuomotor skills directly from images, yet RGB observations lack explicit geometric cues, making learned policies brittle to camera perturbations. To address this, we propose \textbf{Ray-conditioned Vision Transformer Encoder (RayViT)}, a lightweight architecture that injects camera geometry into pretrained ViT backbones. RayViT represents camera geometry as a Plücker ray map, patchifies it into ray features, and uses gated cross-attention to produce a ray-conditioned class token. These ray features are added as dense positional embeddings, while the ray class token replaces the original ViT class token to provide a geometry-aware summary representation. We combine this approach with an auxiliary cosine similarity loss to consistently improve the performance and robustness for geometry-aware tokens. Experiments on sim- and real-robot tasks demonstrate that RayViT improves robustness by approximately 13 percentage points under camera perturbations in multi-task RoboCasa benchmark and by 1.78 average completed stages in real-world multi-task success rate compared to baselines.

We present HBPI-UCRL, a model-based algorithm for hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) that learns high-level and low-level policies in parallel. HBPI-UCRL exploits the fact that a high-level transition corresponds to a multi-step transition at the low level. We introduce two conditions on the low-level dynamics that are sufficient to make parallel HRL learnable. When these conditions hold, we prove that HBPI-UCRL has a polynomial sample complexity in the problem parameters. In the sparse-reward, goal-directed setting, our sample complexity upper bound for HBPI-UCRL is strictly lower than that of its non-hierarchical counterpart, providing theoretical justification for the empirical success of HRL.

Driving style refers to the behavioral preferences that drivers maintain during driving, shaped by their diverse experiences, habits, and needs, and is typically reflected in varying levels of aggressiveness. If humans choose to use autonomous driving systems, they would expect the driving style of the systems to closely resemble their own habit. However, this is challenging for current industrial autonomous driving systems. To address this, we developed a style controllable action generation method, STAGE, for driving tasks. Its training process is based on imitation learning, incorporating both style value and latent value action modality encoding. Preference learning is then used to identify the user's driving style as a continuous, monotonic style value. And to reduce the cost of human involvement in the preference training process, we also developed a set of rules to compare driving style in data pairs. Then, during inference, the user inputs the style value to control the generated action patterns, dynamically meeting the user's expectations. Using the STAGE method, we verified that the style-controlled action generation results in several typical road scenarios significantly align with human expectations. Furthermore, through comparisons between the STAGE method and various other approaches, we reveal the unique functionalities of STAGE, including its style controllability, style continuity, driving style alignment capability and driving safety. The code for this work is available at: https://github.com/CarlDegio/STAGE

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) broadcasts a single response-level reward to every token, while on-policy distillation (OPD) scores each token against a stronger teacher for a dense advantage but caps performance at teacher quality and discourages exploration beyond it. Their complementarity makes combining RLVR and OPD promising, but we find that fusing the two advantages with a fixed coefficient triggers entropy collapse from two miscalibrations: a magnitude mismatch, where token-level OPD advantages can spike far beyond the bounded RLVR advantage and erase its signal, and a temporal mismatch, where sustained full-strength OPD keeps pulling the student toward the teacher and limits exploration needed to surpass it. We propose SAF, a Stable Advantage Fusion framework that resolves both issues via a lightweight, four-stage pipeline applied only to the OPD advantage: a sparsify-then-compress mechanism for magnitude control paired with a warm-up-then-anneal mechanism for temporal control, with each stage independently switchable and adding negligible overhead. Instantiating RLVR with GRPO, we evaluate SAF across seven mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks with Qwen3-1.7B/4B/8B: SAF avoids entropy collapse and consistently outperforms fixed-coefficient GRPO+OPD fusion, improving the aggregate score by 0.51-2.70% across all six model-domain settings while achieving more stable training.