Reacting to sudden physical hazards (catching a slipping plate, dodging a falling knife) is both a meaningful test of embodied intelligence and a hard requirement for deploying multimodal large language models (MLLMs) as the decision coreof household robots. Existing evaluations, however, probe intuitive physics passively through question answering over videos, or target deliberate, long-horizon tasks such as navigation and rearrangement; none measure whether a model can turn physical understanding into immediate, safety-critical action. We introduce ReactHuman, the first physics-grounded benchmark for human-like reactive decision-making, in which the evaluated MLLM acts as the brain of a simulated humanoid facing sudden household hazards; it spans 17 event families and over 1,000 bit-for-bit reproducible scenes with exact, annotation-free ground truth derived from 240 Hz rigid-body simulation, including adversarial objects whose appearance contradicts their physics (a foam anvil, a steel apple). We further design a five-metric suite that scores each reaction along three axes: reasonable, safe, and physically grounded. We physically execute every committed plan so that decisions have observable consequences. With this harness we evaluate seven representative MLLMs. Results show that reactive safety is far from solved: models mishandle roughly one hazard in three, act from fixed dispositions rather than the observed scene, trust appearance over motion, and miss interception points at meter scale even when the chosen action is correct; none of these failures shrink with model scale. ReactHuman thus offers both a fine-grained diagnosis and a scalable training signal toward physically grounded, safety-aware embodied agents. The benchmark can be found here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Alan123/reacthuman-benchmark-scaled

Reconfigurable robots can change their contact geometry when a fixed body cannot negotiate an obstacle. A variable-geometry truss (VGT) distributes this shape change through a load-bearing structure, but coupling it to a mobile base creates a high-dimensional coordination problem. GeoTrussRover combines an electrically actuated VGT, a wheeled base, and contact-semantic morphology planning and control. We solve one source traversal and extract four contact-semantic primitives that describe coordination among 21 members. Physics-constrained projection adapts them to unseen step heights with the same contact topology. When every phase remains feasible, adaptation does not recompute the complete motion. If one phase violates the new physical constraints, only that phase is recomputed. A full-space QP then tracks the adapted motion and corrects member and wheel errors. For transfer from 0.10m to 0.075m, the method reduces objective-function evaluations by 63.7% relative to full recomputation. Contact-phase feasibility analysis covers step heights from 0.10 to 0.46m, or 1.08 to 4.97 wheel radii, with the upper value near the theoretical feasible boundary. The electric prototype traverses 2.11 wheel radii. The resulting low-dimensional representation stores task coordination in a hyper-redundant, load-bearing morphology and reuses it during locomotion.

Imitation learning for dexterous hands is bottlenecked by the difficulty of collecting contact-rich demonstrations that transfer faithfully to the robot. Prior wearable-exoskeleton systems record only on the human side and retarget via open-loop mappings calibrated in free space, which degrade under contact. We present SEED-UMI, a framework in which both the human and the robot wear the same exoskeleton: joint encoders become a physically shared measurement, and wrist cameras mounted to the exoskeleton observe the same outer mechanism during both human data collection and robot policy rollouts. This turns retargeting into paired cross-embodiment supervision and lets policies train directly on raw exoskeleton-centric wrist images, without segmentation or inpainting. On five contact-rich tasks, SEED-UMI achieves 3.0x greater data collection efficiency than exoskeleton-based teleoperation and a 70.0% average rollout success rate.

Enabling robots to perform musical instruments with human-level expressivity represents a frontier in bridging the gap between mechanical precision and artistic interpretation. Despite advances in robotic dexterity, replicating the fluid finger transitions and nuanced dynamic control characteristic of human pianists remains a significant challenge. Through a reinforcement learning-based control framework, we demonstrate that a dexterous robotic hand can achieve high-fidelity performance across a diverse piano repertoire. Central to our approach is a graph-based optimization strategy that guides the robot to generate natural pre-press and key-press fingering strategies that closely resemble human movement patterns. To achieve expressive sound production, the control system is coupled with a physics-inspired acoustic model that modulates keypress velocity to accurately reproduce the dynamic variations specified in musical scores. Quantitative evaluations demonstrate that our expressive control model significantly outperforms baseline methods in both finger morphology similarity and dynamic velocity accuracy. In a perceptual test involving participants from diverse listener groups, performances generated by our system are significantly preferred over baseline robotic performances and are indistinguishable from human performances for non-professional audiences. Furthermore, extensive experiments across multiple musical styles confirm that our method maintains high note-level accuracy while achieving expressive performance. Our approach provides a robust pathway for robotic systems to move beyond mere mechanical accuracy, elevating robotic musicianship to a level of expressive performance comparable to human pianists.

We study reinforcement learning (RL) with transition look-ahead, where the agent may observe which states would be visited upon playing any sequence of actions before deciding its course of action. Although look-ahead can substantially improve achievable performance, [1] showed that optimal planning with multi-step transition look-ahead is NP-hard. However, this hardness was established using a discount factor close to one. It was therefore unknown whether the problem remains hard for every discount factor, and whether near-optimal planning can nevertheless be performed efficiently. We resolve both questions. First, we show that for every fixed discount factor, exact planning remains NP-hard. Second, we introduce a randomized polynomial-time approximation scheme for every fixed look-ahead depth. Third, we extend our approach to account for unknown transitions. We empirically validate the soundness of our results on the wind-farm storage-control benchmark of [2], showing that our approach, optimally accounting for -step look-ahead information, offers substantially better performance than existing algorithms. [1] Corentin Pla, Hugo Richard, Marc Abeille, Nadav Merlis, Vianney Perchet : On the Hardness of Reinforcement Learning with Transition Look-Ahead [2] Chenbei Lu, Zaiwei Chen, Tongxin Li, Chenye Wu, Adam Wierman : Reinforcement Learning with Imperfect Transition Predictions: A Bellman-Jensen Approach

This paper investigates optimal control for nonlinear systems with unknown dynamics, input constraints, disturbances, and adversarial signals. The objective is to develop a learning-based control method that allows the designer to prescribe the desired convergence time in advance. An integral reinforcement-learning framework is proposed to avoid requiring exact knowledge of the system dynamics while ensuring that the control input always satisfies the actuator constraints. Current and recorded data are combined to train the critic without requiring persistent excitation. The learning gain is selected directly from the prescribed convergence deadline. Lyapunov analysis is then used to establish practical predefined-time convergence of the coupled state-critic system in the presence of disturbances and adversarial channels. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated through the stabilization control of a two-link robot manipulator.

Safe offline reinforcement learning assumes a cost function on every transition. We ask what remains possible when safety can be judged only by comparing short clips and occasionally asking whether an episode exceeded its budget. Certified safety curation answers with a filter-then-clone pipeline: a state-only value trained from segment comparisons scores whole trajectories, Learn-then-Test calibration certifies a selection threshold under a distribution-free $(α, δ)$ bound on the unsafe fraction of the selection, and behavior cloning follows. What is certified is the training set, not the policy, whose cost we report rather than bound. Where no threshold attains the target, the procedure refuses. We are not aware of prior work certifying the composition of a training set for offline RL or imitation. Oracle controls justify the design: reweighting individual transitions fails even with an exact value, so the value selects whole trajectories. The policies satisfy the cost budget on twelve of fifteen DSRL tasks, matching a clone of the ground-truth safe subset, which needs a label on every trajectory. Retrained on the certified selection, the strongest full-label method becomes safe where no setting of its own cost target rescues it. Refusal is predictable: the certificate's probability has a closed form in the purity of the pool's top quantile, which the calibration sample estimates and through which the scorer enters.

In continual reinforcement learning, carefully managing the stability-plasticity tradeoff remains a core challenge. Recent work by Abel et al. (2025) formalized this dilemma by defining plasticity as the generalized directed information from an agent's observations to its actions, and empowerment as the generalized directed information from its actions to its observations. This formulation successfully reframes the traditional stability-plasticity tradeoff as an empowerment-plasticity tradeoff. However, while extensive literature exists on optimizing for empowerment, there is currently no research addressing the optimization of plasticity under this new definition. This paper presents preliminary work toward optimizing plasticity within Markov decision processes. We show that there exists a Bellman optimality equation for optimizing plasticity similar to previous work for empowerment.

Tree-structured rollouts give critic-free reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) step-level credit: fork a chain at an intermediate point, and sibling outcome differences estimate step value. Each fork adds sampling cost, so realistic budgets typically allow only a few forks per chain. A fork placed where the outcome is already largely settled yields siblings that mostly agree and provide almost no credit signal; hence, for a given tree size, where forks are placed largely determines how much step-level RL can gain. Most existing mainstream methods place forks by structure, such as fixed lengths, midpoints, and delimiters, or by next-token entropy. We formalize fork placement as locating the \emph{pivots} of the chain's value curve, where the expected outcome turns. We propose \emph{belief-shift branching}: read the model's answer belief at candidate boundaries and fork just before the step where consecutive beliefs diverge most. Three instantiations, none needing step-level supervision, span access levels: a black-box probe, a logit-lens depth profile, and a learned activation direction, which is fit offline and therefore used only in the validation before RL training. The signal only \emph{places} forks, and the probe costs about $1\%$ of step compute on mathematics and under $5\%$ on code when it runs inside the rollout engine. In that validation, against Monte-Carlo value curves, a belief-shift signal ranks first in each of the eight model$\times$benchmark panels, ahead of entropy, structural, and LLM-judge baselines. In RL across three model families and two domains, belief-shift forking leads every mathematics aggregate, on OLMo-3-7B by $+2.6$ aggregate and $+2.9$ on AIME 2026 over the strongest baseline, and sweeps every OLMo code column, by $+6.5$ on LiveCodeBench-medium.

Reinforcement learning (RL) agents deployed in real-world environments are often vulnerable to adversarial perturbations in state observations, creating risks in safety-critical applications. Certification methods can improve robustness against adversarial perturbations by providing lower bounds on expected cumulative rewards. Existing certification methods, however, mainly focus on risk-neutral objectives. In this paper, we extend certification methods to risk-sensitive objectives by establishing lower bounds on the exponential utility of cumulative rewards under $l_{p}$-norm-bounded state adversarial perturbations ($1\leq p <\infty$). By introducing a $φ$-divergence relaxation of the perturbation set, we formulate the risk-sensitive certification problem as a convex optimization and derive its dual to obtain a tractable approximation of the certified lower bound. We further propose an empirical method that improves certified lower bounds by selecting the training risk-aversion parameter $β$ independently of the risk level used during evaluation. Experiments on both OpenAI Gym environments and a machine replacement problem show that, compared to risk-neutral training, risk-averse training generally yields policies with higher certified lower bounds, particularly under larger perturbation budgets. Moreover, under both risk-neutral and risk-averse evaluation settings, increasing risk aversion during training leads to non-monotonic certification performance, where certified lower bounds initially improve but eventually decrease due to overly conservative policies.